"Share of freehold" sits between two well-known tenures — pure leasehold and pure freehold — and is often presented as the best of both. The reality is more nuanced. This guide explains what share of freehold actually means, what it changes, what it does not change, and what to check before buying.
What share of freehold actually is
The legal structure of a typical share-of-freehold flat is:
- Each flat still has a long lease (typically 999 years).
- The freehold of the whole building is owned by a company.
- You become a director and shareholder of that company when you buy the flat.
So the lease still exists. Service charge still exists. Ground rent is typically peppercorn (because the freeholders — you and your neighbours — do not charge themselves rent). The substantial difference is governance: instead of an external freeholder making decisions about the building, you and your neighbours do, jointly.
What changes for the better
- No external freeholder taking a margin. Service charge is what it actually costs to run the building, not cost-plus-profit.
- Decisions on works are collective. If your roof needs replacing, you and the other leaseholders choose the contractor and timing.
- Lease extensions are cheap. The freehold company can extend leases without statutory negotiations, often at minimal cost.
- Ground rent is typically peppercorn. No escalating clauses to worry about.
- Alterations consent is collective. You ask your neighbours, not a distant landlord.
What does not change — or gets harder
- Service charge still exists. Insurance, communal cleaning, utility for shared areas, reserve fund, accountancy — all still apply.
- You are now a director. You have legal duties under the Companies Act — annual returns, accounts, statutory filings. Most blocks pay an accountant or managing agent to handle this, but the legal responsibility sits with the directors.
- Disputes with neighbours become harder. When you disagree about a major works contractor or extension request, there is no external arbiter — just you and your fellow shareholders, sometimes for years.
- Sale can be slower. Buyer's solicitors want to see the freehold company's accounts, articles, and minutes. The seller (you, eventually) needs to extract all this paperwork.
The mortgage view
Lenders treat share-of-freehold favourably for mortgage purposes — it is generally considered lower-risk than leasehold-only. Rates are typically the same as for leasehold flats; some lenders apply marginally more favourable criteria. The lease length still matters: if the lease (not the freehold) is under 80 years, lender conditions tighten.
What to check before buying
- The lease itself. Length, ground rent (should be peppercorn), service charge mechanism, alterations clauses.
- The freehold company. Companies House records: when was it incorporated, what filings are outstanding, are there any County Court judgments?
- The articles of association. How are decisions made (simple majority? unanimous?), how are disputes resolved, can a shareholder be forced out?
- Recent meeting minutes. Are the directors aligned, or is there ongoing conflict?
- Reserve fund balance. Major works coming up? Is there enough set aside?
- Insurance arrangement. Who arranges it, is it competitive, is the cover adequate?
Common share-of-freehold problems
The structure works best with 4 to 12 flats and engaged neighbours. It works worst with:
- Very small buildings (2–3 flats): a single difficult neighbour can block decisions.
- Very large buildings (20+ flats): co-ordination overhead can grow, and the structure starts to look like a corporate freehold without the professional management.
- Buildings with absent owners. If one flat is a buy-to-let owned by someone overseas who never responds to meeting requests, decisions can stall.
- Buildings with unresolved historic disputes. Bad blood does not go away when a new flat owner arrives.
Share of freehold vs commonhold
Commonhold is a separate UK tenure introduced in 2002 but rarely used. The Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 is intended to revive it. The structural difference is that commonhold replaces leases entirely with freehold units governed by a commonhold association — cleaner, conceptually, but the legal infrastructure is still maturing. For now, share-of-freehold remains the dominant model for collective freehold ownership in flats.
Key point: Share of freehold is materially better than pure leasehold — cheaper running costs, easier lease extension, more control. It is not freehold. The lease still exists. The neighbours still matter. Check both before buying.
If you are also considering a leasehold-only purchase, our full tenure explainer compares the three options in detail.
Frequently asked questions
Is share of freehold the same as freehold?
No. With share of freehold, each flat still has a long lease, but the freehold of the building is collectively owned by a company whose shareholders are the flat owners. The lease still exists. Service charge still exists. You and your neighbours just collectively control the freeholder.
Do I still pay ground rent on a share-of-freehold flat?
Typically no — share-of-freehold companies usually charge a peppercorn ground rent to themselves, meaning no real ground rent is paid. Some older share-of-freehold structures may have legacy ground rent provisions, so always check the specific lease.
Is share of freehold a good thing or a problem?
Generally good. It removes the external-freeholder margin, makes lease extension cheaper, and gives you control over works. The trade-off is governance overhead — you become a director, with legal duties — and disputes with neighbours become harder because there is no external arbiter.
Want to know what a specific property is really worth?
Paste any Rightmove URL and get a full analysis — fair value, negotiation strategy, EPC and flood risk — for £9.99.
Get Your Report —